The Church’s ecstatic Existence and Evangel[istic] Mandate

The Church is for the world, because God in Christ is for the world:

For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him will not perish, but have everlasting life. -John 3:16

The Gospel gives us life eternal; the Gospel is God’s life for the world, for us, in Christ; thus, genuine life, of the eternal type, of God’s triune type, comes ecstatically to us. It comes to us from the vicarious humanity of Christ as ā€˜He becomes us that we might [by grace] become Him, and share in the superabundance of God’s triunity that has always already been. This ā€˜alien’ form of life becomes native to us only as we come into union with Christ (unio cum Christo); it, again, is a life given to us, afresh anew, as the grace of God in Christ by the Holy Spirit, continuously sustains and paracletes us with the risen and ascended body of the Son of Man. Since this life is extra nos (ā€˜outside of us’) this presupposes or implies that life for all, for the world, is outside of them. That is to say, the new creation, that is the resurrected and ascended vicarious humanity of Christ, has universal inclusion. All of humanity is only humanity insofar that God is humanity for them, for us, in Jesus Christ. As such, the constitution of the Church necessarily includes all of humanity, insofar that the Christ’s humanity is archetypal humanity. This calls the Church, as the Church is constituted by the esse of God’s life for the world in Jesus Christ, to a kerygmatic existence. This is an existence that, by definition, is populated by ā€˜worldings,’ by people like us. This mission of God (missio Dei), as first given for the world ad extra in the economy of His life in the assumptio carnis, is one that requires for the Church’s flourishing (and telos) that she constantly goes out into the highways and byways of the world seeking the lost sheep for whom Christ has shed His eternal blood. The Church is a ā€˜go out into the nations and make disciples reality,’ or in the end, it is nothing but an incurved sociality of people who are living for themselves, in the name of Christ; thus, forming institutional bonds that keeps the world out there, and the Church ā€˜in here’—hence, quenching what, and who in fact the Church is ultimately for.

Matt Jenson writes this about the Gospel as Church:

. . . It is the very logic of the gospel which both judges and justifies Christian theology and then compels and frees it to engage widely and deeply with and in the world.

The material implication can be seen in ecclesiology. To be the church, the ekklesia, is to be that body of people who have been ā€˜called out’ — out of the world, yes, but also out of ourselves. It is to be those who live excurvatus ex se, finding our lives, ourselves in Christ and in one another. A relational account of ecclesiology, particularly one with an ecstatic dynamic, will yield a doctrine of the Church that emphasizes its missional, eschatological and, above all, doxological character. This is a Church open to the world, the future and God; but even more it is a Church open for the world, the future and God. Living in and as the Church is not living self-satisfied in the possession of eternal life but is instead living ecstatically in a continual outreach which hopes for an ever-widening ā€˜inner circle’ and lives towards the vision of Revelation 7 in which people from every tongue, tribe and nation bow in worship before the Lamb of God.[1]

The Apostle fleshes this very pattern out in the context of his Philippi hymn:

Ā 5Ā Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus,Ā 6Ā who,Ā being in the form of God, did not consider itĀ robbery to be equal with God,Ā 7Ā butĀ made Himself of no reputation, taking the formĀ of a bondservant,Ā andĀ coming in the likeness of men.Ā 8Ā And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself andĀ becameĀ obedient toĀ the point ofĀ death, even the death of the cross.Ā 9Ā Therefore God alsoĀ has highly exalted Him andĀ given Him the name which is above every name,Ā 10Ā that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth,Ā 11Ā andĀ thatĀ every tongue should confess that Jesus ChristĀ isĀ Lord, to the glory of God the Father.12Ā Therefore, my beloved,Ā as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence,Ā work out your own salvation withĀ fear and trembling;Ā 13Ā forĀ it is God who works in you both to will and to doĀ forĀ HisĀ good pleasure.14Ā Do all thingsĀ withoutĀ complaining andĀ disputing,Ā 15Ā that you may become blameless andĀ harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine asĀ lights in the world,Ā 16Ā holding fast the word of life, so thatĀ I may rejoice in the day of Christ thatĀ I have not run in vain or labored inĀ vain.17Ā Yes, and ifĀ I am being poured outĀ as a drink offeringĀ on the sacrificeĀ and service of your faith,Ā I am glad and rejoice with you all.Ā 18Ā For the same reason you also be glad and rejoice with me.

Paul knew where His life came from, that is from the One who ā€˜humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross.ā€ As such, by the Spirit, he lived out of the life being poured into His, afresh anew, moment by moment, as the sustenance of His life has come for His life in Christ’s. This pattern is continued in Paul’s life as he ā€˜pours himself out as a drink offering,’ since this is the character of the ecstatic life He is receiving from Jesus. It is this freedom, the freedom of God, which God has graciously invited us into through becoming us in Christ, that Paul is compelled by the love of Christ for others; for the Church; for the Gentile world at large.

The Church in this instance isn’t a prolongation of the incarnation, instead it is a testimony, a witness to the fundamentum of its life as that is given to her by the risen and ascended body of Christ. The Church is not the head, but the ambassador to this world that Christ is risen, ascended, and coming again! The Church is the sanctorum communio only insofar that she receives God’s eternal life for the world in Jesus Christ. It is this ā€˜release of the prisoners’ that the Church is to proclaim loudly from the rooftops; that is, that Christ is Lord, and that because of who He is in the triune life, He is the One for the many. The Church has life only as that is ecstatically given to her, and the life that is given for her is, indeed, given for the sins of the world.

[1] Matt Jenson,Ā The Gravity of SinĀ (New York: T&T Clark a Continuum Imprint, 2006), 190.

Sin as Primarily Relational Rather than Forensic

Often you will see me emphasizing the sin/grace matrix as a relational rather than a purely forensic reality. This bears out only if the One we have sinned against is in fact a personal rather than monadic law-like being. Sin is personal and relational because, first, God is a relation of triune persons. At root our relationship to Godself is indeed based upon the correspondence God has first (before the foundations of the world) established for us in His imago Dei (cf. Col. 1.15), in His free and gracious election to be with us in the vicarious humanity of Jesus Christ. So the ground of our relationship to God is necessarily relational and personalist insofar that our being, as human, is first grounded in God’s being to be human for us. When the first sin happened, Adam’s or ā€˜humanity’s’ being with God was ruptured requiring that our beings be restored or reconciled unto their originating ground as that was and is found in God’s triune life. Were there ā€˜legal’ consequences attending this fall as well? Yes. But those were only the external aspects of the real problem, which was a broken heart that no longer pumped from the vessels of God’s heart for us in Jesus Christ. That is to say, there is a deeper problem behind what might conclude in other expressions that may entail legal as well as other matters.

Matt Jenson offers good insight on how the aforementioned is fleshed out in the theology of Karl Barth:

Because sin is directed against a person rather than an abstract law of nature, relational rather than juridical categories are the fitting conceptual tools to describe it (IV/1, p. 140). The metaphor of incurvature, which carries with it the implication of having curved away from a relationship or relationships, fits well this relational character of sin. Sin is the refusal to conform to our determination in Christ to be relationally constituted and relationally directed. And the fact that even in isolation which the metaphor conveys one cannot escape the remainder of the relationships which have been shunned underscores Barth’s point that sin can only ever be self-contradiction, stopping short of self-transformation or the realization of a real, alternate possibility. Sin can only be an ā€˜impossible possibility’ (IV/1, pp. 409-10; IV/2, p. 495; IV/3.1, p. 463).[1]

[1] Matt Jenson, The Gravity of Sin (New York: T&T Clark a Continuum Imprint, 2006), 152.