On Ethnic Israel and Jesus

Given whatโ€™s going on with Israel and Iran I jotted down some thoughts (elsewhere online) on Israel and how ethnic Israel continues to relate to the Man from Nazareth, Jesus Christ.

There is a right-wing movement among some so-called MAGA people who are highly antisemitic, or we could more accurately say: supersessionist. They have bought into the old rhetoric that Israel as a nation ceased to exist in 70AD, never to reunite again. But her ethnicity has always been vouchsafed in the Man from Nazareth (see Jeremiah 31). Her ethnicity transcends itself in its purpose as the Messiah bearer for the world. And yet, the promises made to the fathers remain irrevocable (see Romans 11:29). If the nation of Israel, as a people group ceases to be, this would entail that the Man from Nazareth, the Son of David, would cease to be. But since He cannot cease to be in his particularity as a regionalized man, then neither can the nation that bore him cease to be in its perdurance before God. And this is why, I would suggest, that whether leftist or rightist, antisemitism has continued to exist down throughout the ages. The Enemy of our souls seeks to kill, steal, and destroy anything that stands for the ultimate purposes of God; including the Jews. Rightists are just as malevolent as the Leftists, and of the spirit of this age; in the kingdom of darkness rather than in the kingdom of the Son of His love. The pattern has always been: โ€œto the Jew first, and then the Gentile.โ€ That motif has never changed.

Jesus is the true Israel; the Jew from Nazareth. The church is only the true Israel for supersessionists and some Catholics.

The whole Kingdom of Christ is contingent upon the fact that Jesus is the Son of David. Thatโ€™s where his free election to be human was and is situated. Jewishness wasnโ€™t abrogated by the ascension of Christ, Jewishness was amplified by the expansionism of becoming the one (Jesus) for the many in the organic fulfillment of both the Abrahamic and New Covenants, respectively (and all the covenants in between, Davidic in particular). The nation or eretz (Land) of Israel today isnโ€™t the Kingdom, per se; but it is a foreshadowing and demonstration that God remains faithful to His promises; for the Jew first, then the Greek. Political Israel today isnโ€™t the Kingdom of Christ, but it is a demonstration of Godโ€™s faithfulness to His Word; which He willingly descended into in a Jewish body by design and grace. Only a Gnostic or Marcionite could think that God emptied His โ€œhuman shellโ€ at the ascension. No Christian of canonical principle would ever affirm that ethnic Israel was superseded by the coming of the Son of Man. Lots of rubbish being pushed around in the โ€œChristianโ€ church on this.

4 thoughts on “On Ethnic Israel and Jesus

  1. While we have appreciated much of what you have written on your blog, we are very sad to see this piece. JB Torrance would completely disagree with you. Gary and Cathy Deddo

  2. โ€œPolitical Israel today isnโ€™t the Kingdom of Christ, but it is a demonstration of Godโ€™s faithfulness to His Word; which He willingly descended into in a Jewish body by design and grace.โ€ Indeedโ€ฆ Godโ€™s faithfulness!

    Yes.. tragically.. โ€œLots of rubbish being pushed around in the โ€œChristianโ€ churchโ€ฆโ€

  3. @Gary, hello, great to hear from you. Please be specific though. What part would JBT disagree with me on? As much as I appreciate the Torrances, Thomas in particular, they don’t end up being the canon by which I measure my conclusions by. But in order for your comment to be more critically helpful to me please explain further what you mean. I’d like to make sure you’re interpreting me correctly. So, in other words, I wasn’t attempting to be Torrancean, per se, but Bobbyian. I am offering my own constructive reading on these matters. But please, yes, tell me why this post saddens you.

Comments are closed.