The No-God of Jordan Peterson: And the Conservative Evangelical’s Love Affair with Power in the Public Square

Credit: ZachDrawThings

Jordan Peterson, that lightning bolt of a character these days, even for many Christians, just recently tweeted the following on his Twitter account:

God is the mode of being you value the most as demonstrated or manifested in your presumption, perception and action. โ€“Jordan Peterson, June 25th 9:13 pm (Twitter)

In some of my reading Iโ€™m doing on Barthโ€™s theology (actually some rereading in this case) I came across the following quote from Harvard theologian, Gordon Kaufman:

The concept โ€œGodโ€ arises formally as ground and limit of the concept of โ€œworld,โ€ and materially it arises out of the richness of human experience: for example, the experience of creativity, but also that of need and desire. God must be the ultimate reference point for human cultural and moral concerns. The two functions of the concept of โ€œGodโ€ thus are the relativizing and the humanizing of the world. Since the concept โ€œGodโ€ is not a report on information, and since the concepts that theology scrutinizes are employed to help us solve problems of meaningful moral and cultural living, theology is a practical rather than a theoretical discipline.[1]

As McCormack notes โ€œThe influence of Immanuel Kant on Kaufmanโ€™s perspective should be clear.โ€[2]

I couldnโ€™t help but see some similarity between what Peterson recently tweeted and the ethos distilled in the Kaufman quote. For both God is a human projection, something immanent within the processes of the world โ€˜spiritโ€™ and experience. Which makes one wonder, in some ways, why so many conservative evangelical Christians have become fan boys of Peterson; there seems to be dissonance between what conservatives creedally confess, as Christians, and who they pragmatically affirm in the greater struggle of the culture wars. There seems to be this sense that Peterson represents conservative evangelical values, and as such is worthy of carrying the torch that burns all progressive and liberal opponents at the stake of all that is unworthy in the realm of ideas in the public square.

Yet, ironically, it strikes me as odd, at least, that the poster-boy for conservatives is, in regard to his thinking on God, as progressive and โ€˜turned-to-the-subjectโ€™ as the Progressive and Liberal theologians are; as Kaufman helps to illustrate. Sooner or later Petersonโ€™s commitments, on no-God, will come back to bite the very conservatives who are currently giving him platform and voice.

 

[1] Gordon Kaufman, โ€œEssay on Theological Method,โ€ in Hans Frei, โ€œTypes of Christian Theology,โ€ cited by Bruce L. McCormack, Orthodox and Modern: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008), 117.

[2] Ibid., 117.

1 thought on “The No-God of Jordan Peterson: And the Conservative Evangelical’s Love Affair with Power in the Public Square

  1. Pingback: The No-God of Jordan Peterson: And the Conservative Evangelicalโ€™s Love Affair with Power in the Public Square โ€” The Evangelical Calvinist | James' Ramblings

Comments are closed.