Phil Johnson, of the Pyromaniacs, is Out of Blogging Retirement: In Good Form

When I started blogging back in 2005, Phil Johnson did too; the Phil Johnson of what became the Pyromaniacs. For all intents and purposes I was genuinely a troll at his blog, but that was when most people on blogs were trolls; that was the time before trolls even knew there was such a thing. My intentions were anything but being trollish. I used to challenge them, and their readers, to at least admit that they had a theological superstructure informing the way they read the Bible and arrive at their exegetical conclusions. I used to inform that that Thomism and classical theism was their informing theology; and I did this ad infinitum. After many years I finally quit engaging with them at all, but that took me some time to get to. In the mean time Phil Johnson retired his Pyromaniacs blog, and it has been such for the last six years plus. Iโ€™ve also moved on during that time, writing most of my blog posts with the intention of, at the very least, offering some positive thought on some theological loci that I am covering through my various theological readings. Anyway, Phil just came out of retirement; he believes, in the fullness of time, that the evangelical world, inclusive of The Gospel Coalition, is sliding headlong into progressive immoralism of all sorts (in some ways I donโ€™t disagree with him in a general senseโ€”although I do disagree with him in regard to TGC).

Since Phil has made a come-back, and given my history with his blog, out of nostalgia, I started making some comments on his first real post; surprisingly I found myself defending TGC. Apparently Phil believes that Iโ€™m just attempting to use his blog as a grand-standing event for myself, and so wrote the following comment to me (this is the most pertinent part that I wanted to highlight):

(This final thought applies to you in particular because of my long track record with your style of commenting. But it’s not for you alone; this is for all the propagandists on the evangelical fringe who seem think my return to blogging was a signal for them to come swarming out out [sic] from under the dumpster, or wherever):

The comments on my blog are as open as possible in order to provide a forum for conservative evangelicals to discuss whatever topic is raised in the post. Theological renegades who want to use my blog-comments as a soapbox in order to advance their own neo-orthodox agenda (or any other post-evangelical schema) will find themselves unceremoniously blocked from commenting further. Last warning.[1]

For the more soft-skinned this might make their feelings get hurt; for me, it gave me warm-fuzzies. It reminded me of the good old Pyromaniacs troll days, and brought back some fun memories. But it also reminded me why Iโ€™m glad those are just memories, and ones that Iโ€™ve moved beyond.

In regard to Philโ€™s view of me: He thinks Iโ€™m a propagandist; go look at his blog and tell me who fits that better. He thinks Iโ€™m โ€˜evangelical-fringeโ€™; most conservative evangelicals I know who know about the Pyromaniacs think theyโ€™re not for serious (Iโ€™m being nice). He thinks Iโ€™m neo-orthodox; Barth wasnโ€™t, Iโ€™m not. He seems to think Iโ€™m post-evangelical; only if MacArthur represents evangelicalism. He thinks Iโ€™m a theological-renegade; the Pharisees thought Jesus was one too. He thinks I came โ€˜swarming out from under the dumpsterโ€™; the Apostle Paul said he โ€˜is considered the scum of the earth.โ€™

I mean I feel in pretty good company.

[1] Source.