Responding To Tim Challies § 1: Assurance Of Salvation

Tim Challies, theo-blogger par excellence, has just recently posted a couple posts on the issue of assurance of salvation. I wish I could quote both posts in full here, but that wouldn’t work out so well; so instead click here first, and then here second to read both posts in full. I am sorry to say that I am seriously disappointed (understatement) to have read what I read over at Tim’s on this all important issue; especially since Challies has a massive following. While I am not going to quote Tim in full, I will quote a few snippets from him; ones that should give you an idea about what Tim thinks, and how he approaches this all important (pastoral) issue. Here is what Challies thinks about the possibility that folks could have what the Puritans called temporary faith—Tim did not use this language, but that is what he is describing and believes is a real possibility; he says:

It is possible and even normal for the non-Christian to experience a false assurance of salvation.

A foreshadowing of one of the most terrifying scenes the world will ever experience unfolds in Matthew 7, in a section often titled “I Never Knew You.” “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’” When the final judgment comes, there will be many who will be shocked to learn that they are not true believers. They will go to the grave confident that they are saved, but come to the judgment and find that they are to be cast out of Jesus’ presence. This ought to be sobering for all who consider themselves Christians. No wonder that Paul sought confidence in his salvation, declaring in 2 Timothy 1:12 “I know whom I have believed, and I am convinced that he is able to guard until that Day what has been entrusted to me.”

[I]t is a sad but undeniable fact that many people who think they are Christians are not. At the final judgment many will approach Jesus convinced that they are saved only to be told that Jesus never knew them (and hence that they never knew him). The fact is that many people ultimately depend upon themselves for assurance of their salvation. This applies to believers and unbelievers. A person may be truly saved yet look to himself for assurance of this salvation. This is dangerous ground to tread; when a person experiences a time of doubt his misplaced assurance can drive him to despair. When our assurance rests on something we have done, a promise we have made or a prayer we have prayed, we have placed our assurance on shaky ground.

And then Tim appeals to the writings of Donald Whitney to provide the resolution to the problem that he unwittingly (or wittingly) has provided in the previous quotes. Here are the “Marks” a wounded Christian (or maybe not, according to Challies) should look for and to for comfort through this dark night[s] of the soul:

Marks of Salvation

To begin answering this I will once more turn to Donald Whitney, whose work on this subject has done much to shape my understanding of assurance. I will provide an outline of the marks of salvation that he provides. He begins with a discussion of the inner confirmation from the Spirit, showing that the Holy Spirit ministers to us through the Word of God to open our hearts and minds to the Bible in ways that give us assurance. He then teaches that assurance may be experienced partly through the attitudes and actions the Bible says will accompany salvation. Here are several questions which can guide us as we seek assurance:

Do you share the intimacies of the Christian life with other believers?

Do you have a deep awareness of your sin against the Word and love of God?

Do you live in conscious obedience to the Word of God?

Do you despise the world and its ways?

Do you long for the return of Jesus Christ and to be made like Him?

Do you habitually do what is right more and sin less?

Do you love Christians sacrificially and want to be with them?

Do you discern the presence of the Holy Spirit within you?

Do you enjoy listening to the doctrines of the apostles taught today?

Do you believe what the Bible teaches about Jesus Christ?

These biblical principals, taken as a whole, can do much to assure the believer that God is working in his life, or to show the unbeliever that he needs to be made right with God.

Since this is already lengthy in and of itself; I am just going to post this as is, and then follow up with another post. I will sketch, somewhat, the Puritan soteriology that Tim’s approach mimics; and then suggest a way around this problem, theologically and scripturally. I will say here though, that Tim, unfortunately is barking up the wrong tree with this kind of approach to this issue. I am persuaded that the way this issue of “assurance” is usually framed (pace Challies) is through an anthropology and theology that is fundamentally flawed; thus leading to symptomatic and even psychological problems as evinced by the tradition that Challies finds himself situated in.

How might you respond to this? I will provide my response via my next post. So don’t expect me to give anything away in the comments. But I will be happy to hear your thoughts prior to me giving my own (maybe your thoughts here will shape my response).

8 thoughts on “Responding To Tim Challies § 1: Assurance Of Salvation

  1. Thanks for sharing this, Bobby. Challies’ approach does leave me a bit unsettled. Reading the list of questions on “biblical principles” for the assurance of salvation that you’ve quoted above reminds me of Martin Luther’s Anfechtung: How do I get a gracious God? Luther’s crisis was born from the maxim of his Nominalist teachers, “God will not deny grace to the one who does what is in him.” In other words, do your very best, and rest confident that God will make up the rest. He will take your meagre offering and, through Christ, accept it as infinitely valuable.

    We might see that there is an element of sound biblical praxis in there. It’s meant to stress the graciousness of God and the human person’s incapacity to merit grace on her own. But for Luther, it was utterly damning — for how do I know when I’ve really done my best? Could I have done better yesterday? Am I failing to live up to my sanctified potential today?

    Challies’ list points this way. But “the righteous will live by faith.”

    More right, less sinful? More sacrificial, less selfish? More obedient, less incurvatus in se? Can I say these things about myself with great confidence? Most days, I don’t feel so. God, have mercy on me, a sinner.

  2. If you ever want to doubt that you were ever saved, just read the puritan Matthew Mead’s work The Almost Christian Discovered (with a glowing introduction by none other than your friend John MacArthur). 🙂

  3. My first thought when I read this was that it reminded me of the Lordship salvation controversy. Challies is drawing upon an author who has written other books about how we can measure our spiritual progress. It reminds me of the self-centered orientation of the medieval mystics.

    Instead of focusing on the finished work of Christ and what he has done for us the focus becomes all that we can do, have done, and are continuing to do in our service to him. This may be important when we consider our sanctification, but our salvation is not dependent upon such things.

    I do not see how this teaching can lead anyone to an assurance of salvation. If anything it’s going to just create the conditions for a life of doubts and questioning and feeling the need to continue striving to earn one’s way into the grace of God. No thanks! I’ll leave this to those who strive.

  4. @Darren,

    Amen. Absolutely, Luther is a wonderful person to bring up in this context; what you highlight fits well with the medieval disjunction between Iustitia Dei and Iustitia Christi, the former being the standard of God’s righteousness to be met, the latter being the provisional hope for those viatores whom merited it throughout their pilgrimage on earth; the angst, never knowing if in fact I have done enough to be found worthy to receive Christ’s righteousness — thus meeting God’s standard. Luther’s solution; bring both Iustitias together, and rest in sola fide! solus christus! I agree with you and Luther; God have mercy on me a sinner, thank you Jesus!!

    @Ryan,

    Yes, I’ve heard some of Matthew’s stuff; not real uplifting. For that matter neither was William Perkins! Nor is John MacArthur 😉 !

    @Jon,

    Yeah, this definitely is not the way to go; and its definitely not necessary counsel for those struggling with doubt. I.e. To point people to themselves, and a “reflexive faith” model; wherein I look to myself (my good works), before I am able to look at Christ as my Savior. 🙁

  5. Pingback: Responding To Tim Challies §3: Theodore Beza, “Need Some assurance . . .” « The Evangelical Calvinist

  6. My (Lutheran) feeling is that he is not correctly distinguishing law and Gospel. I’ll be interested to see your summary of how you would respond to the question of assurance.

  7. My personal observation is the closer I get to the light,(supposing closeness) the better I can see all my own blemishes, and the more obvious it is that I’m not even close to close to close to giving my best. When I talk to people who are pretty satisfied with their walk and have been for a long time, I think, wow that person is really committed, really blessed by God, or they drank SOME KINDA KOOLAIDE.
    Regardless, much better that our motivation be to draw nearer to Him who loves us with an everlasting love, because of His love, rather than to act out of fear that we may not be saved.

    Lately the song “Worlds Apart” by Jars of Clay, especially this ‘performance’ of it has moved me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq_El_J7jMM
    But even his opening statement that he has tried to rid himself “of all but love… to give and die” amazes me. I am so not there, and even so, in the song, he has failed – bottomed out. Pray the Lord, He changes me to be a lover of men’s souls and a lover of GOD.

  8. Dave K,

    I would say you are correct!

    Duane,

    Yes, I think this “negative” kind of question is never really quite addressed in the “way” that it is being framed through Challies’ framework.

Comments are closed.